Skip to content
GTM due diligence for PE, VC and CEOs

What the report looks like.

The pages that matter, shown on an illustrative company. Every number here is made up to show the format. A real redacted report will replace it after the first engagements.

Scorecard / [Target Co]Sample
Forecasting2
Pipeline management2
Sales process rigour3
Talent evaluation3
Sales and marketing tech stack2
Outbound3
Process and AI maturity3
GTM operating model4
Function assessment3
Planning3
Total 28 / 50Verdict: Adjust
1

The memo opens with the verdict

Memo to the investment committee · page 1 of 5Illustrative · redacted
Project [Name]: can the revenue engine deliver the plan?

Target: [B2B software, CHF 15M ARR] · Date: [date] · Prepared for: [deal team]

ADJUST

The plan needs 3.0 times pipeline coverage. The records show 1.8. Retention and market fit are sound. The plan can still be reached, but not on the hiring schedule in the model, and not without a fix to pipeline generation first.

1. Pipeline covers 1.8x, plan assumes 3.0x
CRM export Q3, CRO interview
Price: reduce year-two growth case. Condition: pipeline plan before the hiring wave.
2. Three reps carry 61% of bookings
Attainment file, two AE interviews
Structure: retention package for key reps.
3. Four tools, no single forecast
Tool inventory, RevOps interview
Condition: one forecast in the CRM within 60 days of close.

Scorecard total 28 / 50 · verdict Adjust · areas at 2: Forecasting, Pipeline management, Tech stack · what would change our view: [two pieces of evidence]

Fig. D / Page one of the memo (Deal DD). Illustrative, not a real engagement.
2

The scorecard scores every area

Scorecard · ten areasIllustrative
A1
Forecasting2 / 5
Accuracy 71%, always optimistic
A2
Pipeline management2 / 5
Coverage 1.8x against 3.0x claimed
A3
Sales process rigour3 / 5
Stages defined, qualification uneven
A4
Talent evaluation3 / 5
Top 3 reps carry 61% of bookings
A5
Sales and marketing tech stack2 / 5
Four tools, no single forecast
A6
Outbound3 / 5
One channel supplies 58% of leads
A7
Process and AI maturity3 / 5
Two pilots, none in production
A8
GTM operating model4 / 5
ICP drives territories
A9
Function assessment3 / 5
Customer 4, SDR 2, enablement 2, marketing 3
A10
Planning3 / 5
Built from capacity, no scenarios
Total
28 / 50
ADJUST
1 to 2 risk to revenue3 holds, needs work4 to 5 strength
Fig. B / Scorecard. Illustrative, not a real engagement.
3

Every score has its reasoning and evidence

Reasoning and evidence · Pipeline managementIllustrative
What the numbers show
Coverage 1.8x after removing 38% of open pipeline with no activity in 60 days or a close date in the past. Stage ageing: 9 of 14 late-stage deals older than the typical winner.
What the people say
The CRO says coverage is "around three times". The two account executives interviewed both said they had cleared little pipeline since January.
Where they disagree
Management counts every open deal. The records count the ones that are still alive.
Score: 2 / 5
Pipeline is thinner than the plan assumes, and nobody owns cleaning it.
Fig. C / Reasoning and evidence. Illustrative, not a real engagement.
4

The numbers are rebuilt from the records

Management forecastRebuilt from CRM recordsIllustrative example
Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Index40% below plan after eight quarters
Fig. F / Forecast rebuilt from CRM records. Illustrative, not a real engagement.
5

The 100-day action plan says who does what

100-day action plan · extractIllustrative
ActionOwnerMeasureStart
Clear stale pipeline and agree stage exit criteriaHead of sales operationsCoverage reported on clean dataWeek 2
One forecast in the CRM, reviewed weeklyCROAccuracy above 85%Week 4
Second outbound channel liveHead of marketing20% of new pipelineWeek 8
Retention package for the three key repsCEONo regretted exitsWeek 3
Fig. G / 100-day action plan, extract. Illustrative, not a real engagement.
6

Benchmarking puts the scores in context

Benchmarking · company against a public benchmark medianIllustrative values
Gross retention93% vs 90%
Win rate24% vs 22%
Forecast accuracy71% vs 85%
Pipeline coverage1.8x vs 3x

Grey: public benchmark median. Colour: the company. Our own anonymised score base is added as engagements accumulate.

Fig. E / Benchmarking. Illustrative, not a real engagement.
7

In a deal, the risk register ties findings to the price

Risk register · extractIllustrative
#FindingAreaEvidenceSev.LikelihoodDeal consequence
1Pipeline coverage 1.8x against 3.0x neededPipelineCRM export Q3; CRO interviewHHighPrice: lower growth case. Condition: pipeline plan before hiring
2Top 3 reps carry 61% of bookingsTalentAttainment file; two AE interviewsMMediumStructure: key-rep retention package
3One channel supplies 58% of leadsOutboundLead source fileMMediumMonitor: second channel live within two quarters
4Unverified: win/loss reasons are free textTech stackCRM field auditLLowCondition: coded loss reasons from day one
Fig. H / Risk register, extract. Illustrative, not a real engagement.
8

The target is asked once, for specific files

Data-room request list · extractFull list on the data-room page
Opportunities8 quarters, with stage history, amount, close date, source, segment, outcome, loss reason
Forecast snapshotsWeekly or monthly, commit and best case
RetentionNet and gross by start-quarter cohort
PeopleOrg chart, quota and attainment by rep, ramp history
Fig. I / Data request, extract. Full list on the data-room page.

Contact

Want one on your deal?

A Health Check ends with the scorecard, evidence and plan in this format, with your real numbers.

Due Diligence / Data-Driven / Double-Digit